When To Call A Criminal Justice Attorney?

On February 8, George Huguely’s first-degree murder trial began in Charlottesville, Virginia. Yeardley Love, the defendant’s ex-girlfriend, was beaten to death in May 2010. At the University of Virginia, both the victim and the perpetrator were lacrosse players (this fact will be become important, at least to the defense, in a moment). This case, and others like it, seems to be about the use of words on both sides, rather than the application of the law. Checkout attorney for criminal charges for more info. The defence argued that “she died in a terrible accident” while the Commonwealth of Virginia prosecutor found it a murder committed out of jealous rage. According to the prosecutor, Huguely took the victim’s computer and tossed it into a dumpster the night of the murder to hide the e-mails he had sent her. Huguely’s attempt to get Love to “reach out to him” the morning after their confrontation, the defence argued, was Huguely’s way of trying to get her to “reach out to him.”

Before her murder, he sent Love an e-mail on April 30, 2010 that said, “You said you’d get back together with me if I stopped getting drunk a week ago, and then you didn’t (are unfaithful). I should’ve assassinated you.”

Huguely was angry, according to the prosecutor, because she had a relationship with a male lacrosse player from the University of North Carolina. The defence attorney described what the Commonwealth attorney considered a threat to damage her as “innocent idiom,” rather than a threat. Okay, that’s it. “I could have killed you” has the same semantic weight as “I’m so hungry I could eat a horse” or “I could kill for a cigarette right now,” according to this definition.

According to the prosecution, Huguely kicked in Love’s bedroom door and aggressively shook her, causing brain damage. His lawyer characterised it as a “physical encounter” between the two. “George never, never, never intended to kill her,” he said. In his opening speech, he assured the jury that Huguely was incapable of planning a murder. “He isn’t overly complex. He isn’t a complicated person. He’s a lacrosse player, to be precise.” (I’m curious if Huguely, when sitting next to his lawyer, suddenly realised, “Hello there! Hold on a second! He just called me a dunderhead!” Huguely’s lawyer argued that his client was only guilty of involuntary manslaughter (due to the “tragic accident”), not premeditated murder.

A Civil Litigation Attorney’s Ten Essential Qualities

Any attorney who wishes to be successful in the area of law must possess certain skills and character qualities that will set him or her apart from the rest of the pack of attorneys. These abilities differ depending on the area of law. The business strategy attorney benefits most from organisational and transactional expertise, while the patent attorney benefits most from technological and scientific knowledge. Civil litigation lawyers should also strive to develop or acquire those skills that can help them attract and retain clients, win lawsuits, and even create new law. The attributes that a civil litigation attorney should possess are mentioned below. Click now Law Office of Stephen J. Haedicke, LLC – New Orleans Civil Litigation Attorney
1. Ability to Communicate Clearly
So you’ve got a perfect case, or one that can be won as long as people accept your legal theory. The capacity of the attorney to articulate the premise of the argument and the justification for choosing your proposed result to the decision maker, be it the judge or the jury, is what separates successful from unsuccessful attorneys and cases. Persuasion, interpersonal skills, and every other aspect combined are less critical than communication. The explanation for this is that communication is at the heart of every important quality that a good civil litigation lawyer must possess. You’ll be well on your way to being a good and much improved civil litigator if you know who you’re interacting with and what your communication’s intent is.
2. The ability to persuade
Any litigator must be capable of persuading a judge, jury, client, or opposing counsel on any given issue. The ability to persuade is critical in any situation. If you’re trying to convince opposing counsel that your case is better than it really is, or convincing a customer that a settlement deal is the best they’ll get, quality is paramount. If a case goes to trial, the winning side is usually the most convincing, unless there is a simple legal conclusion. The ability to understand and relate to people is at the heart of persuasiveness. Persuading your audience is as simple as voicing their issues and emphasising the benefits of your point of view if you can understand and relate to them. In the field of civil litigation, mastering the art of persuasion can lead to success.
3. Interpersonal Communication Skills
While interpersonal skills are not specific to the legal profession, they are more important for practising attorneys than for most other occupations. The civil litigator spends the majority of his or her days conversing and meeting with coworkers, clients, judges, and other lawyers. Each partnership necessitates a unique collection of interpersonal abilities. Some of these relationships necessitate leadership abilities, while others necessitate the ability to listen and react appropriately. Civil litigators, unlike transactional lawyers, must be comfortable talking to people and be able to get along with a wide range of people. If a client does not like his or her attorney, he or she is less likely to use him or her again in the future, regardless of the previous outcome.
4. Ability to Negotiate
While the vast majority of cases are never tried in front of a jury, the desire to take a case to trial is frequently a factor that drives settlement negotiations. Defendants, especially defendant insurance firms, will begin the negotiating process if you are competent and willing to take the case to trial. When bargaining, it’s important to do so in good faith, but it’s also important to remember that the objective is to get the best deal for the customer. According to studies, the cooperative negotiator is able to reach a more favourable negotiating offer than the hostile combative negotiator. Whatever your preferred method, bear in mind that you will most likely deal with that person in your field of work again in the future, so good faith dealing is required to ensure acceptable actions and offers.
5. A Fee System That Is Clearly Explained
Compensation disputes are the source of some of the most common concerns about attorneys. To prevent this, always put the form of billing in writing and clearly clarify it to the customer, whether it is hourly or contingency billing. Furthermore, several billing conflicts occur when the client’s interpretation of whether the charge is taken before or after taxes differs. A fee arrangement that is clearly outlined and comprehensive at the first intake meeting will help to prevent several post-case disputes, as well as future appeals to the state disciplinary committee.